{{item.fa_name}}
جستوجوی دقیق برای معنی Null equivalent در واژهنامه ترجمیک
زمان جستجو: ۰.۰۰۲ هزارم ثانیه
درباره واژهنامه ترجمیک
۰ 
۰[توسط مترجم]
[ریاضی]
هم ارز پوچ
معنی Null equivalent, معنی Nعکک ثضعهذشکثئف, معنی Null equivalent, معنی اصطلاح Null equivalent, معادل Null equivalent, Null equivalent چی میشه؟, Null equivalent یعنی چی؟, Null equivalent synonym, Null equivalent definition,
معنی applicatory, ترجمه applicatory به فارسی, معنی bipolar disorder, ترجمه bipolar disorder به فارسی, معنی Ok, خوب, معنی Abstract The biobank consent debate is one with deeply held convictions on both the ‘broad’ and ‘specific’ side with little sign of resolution. Recently, Thomas Ploug and Soren Holm have developed an alternative to both specific and broad consent: a meta‐consent framework. The aim here is to consider whether meta‐consent provides a ‘solution’ to the biobank consent debate. We clarify what ‘meta‐consent’ actually is (arguing that the label is a misnomer and ‘consent à la carte’ is more accurate). We identify problems with Ploug and Holm’s arguments, and some challenges for metaconsent. We focus on whether there is any ethical obligation to provide consent à la carte. There may seem to be so, especially if we draw upon an unclear appeal to the ethical significance of ‘respect for autonomy’. Similarly, there might seem to be an intuitive inference from the fact that ethically legitimate research requires informed consent to the conclusion that it thereby requires consent à la carte. It is shown that this line o, ترجمه Abstract The biobank consent debate is one with deeply held convictions on both the ‘broad’ and ‘specific’ side with little sign of resolution. Recently, Thomas Ploug and Soren Holm have developed an alternative to both specific and broad consent: a meta‐consent framework. The aim here is to consider whether meta‐consent provides a ‘solution’ to the biobank consent debate. We clarify what ‘meta‐consent’ actually is (arguing that the label is a misnomer and ‘consent à la carte’ is more accurate). We identify problems with Ploug and Holm’s arguments, and some challenges for metaconsent. We focus on whether there is any ethical obligation to provide consent à la carte. There may seem to be so, especially if we draw upon an unclear appeal to the ethical significance of ‘respect for autonomy’. Similarly, there might seem to be an intuitive inference from the fact that ethically legitimate research requires informed consent to the conclusion that it thereby requires consent à la carte. It is shown that this line o به فارسی,
ترجمه مقاله فارسی به انگلیسی،
ترجمه مقالات انگلیسی